Email:[email protected]
Skype:gameest
I used this a couple of times, the first time service was amazing, but the second time I brought 10 million it took longer because they had to verify the transaction. But all in all a great site to use, highly recommend it!
---Jeddolls
- Very good services. Paid for a lot of mule accounts and got the accounts in 1 hour time max. Definitely want to pay more from this site. Cheap and reliable, never been disappointed.
---Jan
- Legitimate and Reliable would definitely buy again.
---smeast
- done a mule and a comfort trade, mule within 20 mins and comfort took 24 hours! speed up comfort trades please! over then that, superb! legit!
---bigwau
- Bought a mule account and it took 10 mins to come in and great prices to!!
---constermac
EVE Online : The Unhappy Cust...
The EVE developer blog has been updated with new information about the so-called Unhappy Customer Project. The blog goes into a bit of detail about the petition process and even acknowledges that there have been some problems that the team is working to improve. The UCP is designed to streamline the process and turn unhappy customers into happy ones.
Before starting the Unhappy Customers project we were doing regular quality audits as well as using the escalation process and organic peer review to locate and fix mistakes. But we wanted even more overview.
The first challenge we faced was finding a way to proactively spot mistakes in petitions that are neither escalated nor reported to Senior or Lead GMs. As we receive approximately 30 thousand petitions every month, manually going over each one was not an option (not one we'd want to bill you guys for, that's for sure). It didn't take much deliberation on our part to realize that the rating system which we've already got in place could be used as a way to spot potentially mishandled petitions by simply looking up the petitions rated poorly by our own customers.
